ECOSYMBOLISM Philosophy Introduction.

By Ana Bikic

The House of Symbols

The Dance of Life and Its Rhythm

Alone we are a drop of water. Together we can become the ocean, through the symbols that belong to us all.

I began developing Eco-Symbolism in 1994, after years of introspection and a search for a deeper understanding of human behavior, psychology, anthropology, creativity, communication, and human evolution.

The meaning of the name is fundamental.

The prefix eco comes from the Greek oikos: house or home. The word symbol reaches us through the Greek symbolon, associated with a sign, token, or means of recognition.

From these roots I formed my own philosophical meaning:

Eco-Symbolism — The House of Symbols.

The “Eco” in Eco-Symbolism does not mean that it is an ecological or environmental art movement. Environmental concerns have been part of my life and my artwork, but Eco-Symbolism is a much broader idea.

The house I am describing is the human house: the immense accumulation of symbols, knowledge, actions, experiences, discoveries, methods, and forms of communication through which humanity has learned to survive, create, adapt, and evolve.

Within that house exists what I call the Library of Humanity's Symbols.

That library did not begin with books.

It did not begin with alphabets, mathematics, or even the first images preserved on cave walls. Before written language there was sound. There were gestures, observation, imitation, memory, repetition, and demonstration.

A sound could warn another human being of danger. A gesture could indicate direction. Someone could observe another person making a tool, finding food, building shelter, caring for another human being, or solving a problem, and repeat what had been learned.

Long before humanity could write its history, humanity was already transmitting knowledge.

As our ability to communicate developed, so did the systems through which knowledge could be preserved and shared: speech, images, alphabets, numbers, geometry, musical notation, maps, drawings, books, scientific and medical illustrations, machines, photography, recordings, and eventually the digital technologies through which information can now travel almost instantaneously around the planet.

Someone had to make the first mark.

Someone had to associate a sound with meaning.

Someone had to recognize a pattern, establish a measurement, devise a notation, demonstrate a method, or find a solution.

And someone else had to receive it.

Humanity did not arrive where we are through isolated individual achievement. We arrived through an accumulation of human experience.

Someone observed.

Someone tried.

Someone failed.

Someone tried again.

Someone discovered.

Someone communicated.

Another person listened, learned, questioned, corrected, improved, and carried that knowledge farther.

We inherited the results.

And we continue the process.

I call this movement the Dance of Life and its Rhythm.

We receive.

We observe.

We repeat.

We question.

We learn.

We create.

We share.

And we begin again.

But the accumulation of symbols alone does not constitute human progress.

Symbols can preserve knowledge, inspire and unite us. They can also confuse, manipulate, divide, drain, or become empty repetitions of what already exists. More information does not necessarily mean more understanding. More communication does not necessarily mean more dialogue. More production does not necessarily mean more creation.

The Library of Humanity's Symbols contains what humanity has transmitted. Critical thinking helps us determine what is worth carrying forward.

That responsibility begins with ourselves.

The First Instrument Is the Self

Eco-Symbolism requires introspection, but introspection is not an invitation to become self-centered.

It is preparation.

Before an instrument can become part of a symphony, it must first be examined, tuned, learned, and practiced.

The same applies to us.

It is easy to criticize or admire the garden next door. The greater challenge is to look through our own window.

When we are emotionally entangled in a problem, fear, pride, insecurity, anger, disappointment, and old habits can distort what we see. We repeat the same emotional record and then wonder why we arrive at the same place.

I can't.

I failed.

This is impossible.

At that moment, Eco-Symbolism asks us to allow critical thinking to take the lead.

We create enough distance from our emotional turbulence to observe ourselves as analytically as we might examine another person's dilemma.

What is actually happening?

What am I repeating?

What am I avoiding?

What can I change?

What do I need to learn?

What can I try differently?

This does not mean eliminating emotion. Our emotional intellect gives us empathy, sensitivity, imagination, and an understanding of human consequences. But when emotion prevents us from seeing ourselves clearly, the reasoning intellect must help us regain perspective.

The purpose of introspection is therefore not to remain absorbed in ourselves.

It is to recognize what needs tuning.

Then comes learning.

Then practice.

Then correction.

Then growth.

And eventually, contribution.

We tune the individual instrument so that we can learn to play together.

Dialogue

A perfectly tuned instrument playing entirely alone cannot create a symphony.

Eco-Symbolism therefore moves from introspection toward dialogue.

Dialogue is not simply speaking.

It requires listening.

Another human being may possess an observation, experience, skill, or piece of knowledge that we do not. Listening does not mean surrendering our judgment, abandoning critical thinking, or accepting every idea as truth.

It means recognizing the limits of our individual knowledge.

Sometimes, by stopping long enough to listen to another person, we can understand something about ourselves that we could not see from inside our own experience.

Today we possess extraordinary technologies for communication. Millions of people can speak simultaneously across the world.

Yet when everyone is speaking and nobody is listening, communication becomes noise.

Knowledge that does not circulate becomes like water without movement.

It stagnates.

Dialogue keeps knowledge moving.

One person brings one piece. Another brings something different. An idea is questioned. An error is exposed. An observation is tested. Knowledge from one discipline encounters knowledge from another. Something is corrected, expanded, rejected, combined, or transformed.

And sometimes something appears that none of the participants could have created alone.

Knowledge, Not Noise

Dialogue, however, is not enough.

A group of people can repeat an error just as easily as one person can.

Opinion is not automatically knowledge. Repetition does not establish truth. Consensus does not transform an assumption into fact.

Eco-Symbolism therefore depends upon empirical knowledge: observation, experience, evidence, testing, comparison, correction, and the willingness to challenge what we believe.

We must be capable of asking:

Is this true?

And equally:

Am I willing to discover that I may be wrong?

This requires leaving ego aside.

The purpose of criticism should not merely be destruction. To identify that something does not work is only the beginning. The more constructive challenge is to understand why it does not work and, whenever possible, contribute knowledge toward a better possibility.

That principle applies to art, science, architecture, technology, work, relationships, and ordinary human problem-solving.

It applies to life.

From the Individual to the Symphony

Human beings are individuals, but we have never been entirely self-sufficient.

Our survival depends upon knowledge we did not personally discover, skills we did not invent, systems we did not construct, and the accumulated work of people whose names we may never know.

Our individuality is not the enemy of cooperation.

It is what makes cooperation valuable.

A violin does not have to become a cello. A flute does not need to imitate a drum. Each develops its own character and capacity.

But if every musician enters the orchestra determined only to be louder than everyone else, there is no symphony.

There is noise.

The musician must know when to play and when to listen.

Humanity has already demonstrated extraordinary individual brilliance. The greater challenge is learning what our different abilities can accomplish when we bring them together without surrendering our individuality.

Alone we are a drop of water. Together we can become the ocean.

Not because every drop becomes identical, but because together they acquire possibilities that no isolated drop possesses.

Hope and the Beginning

This is where I find hope in Eco-Symbolism.

Not in empty optimism.

Not in repeating that everything will be fine.

Hope exists in the evidence that human beings can learn, correct, adapt, share knowledge, inspire one another, and create possibilities that did not exist before.

What appears impossible to one person may not remain impossible when knowledge, disciplines, experience, imagination, and effort are brought together.

But eventually someone must begin.

Knowledge without action remains knowledge.

Dialogue without action remains conversation.

A turning point requires the courage to leave the familiar.

One of the four central paintings through which I presented Eco-Symbolism at the Florence Biennale in 2007 is The Beginning.

I represented the beginning with a small sea turtle entering an immense ocean.

The hatchling is fragile. The ocean is unknown. Many begin the journey; only some will survive, grow, cross the ocean, and eventually return to continue the cycle.

The turtle does not begin because the journey is guaranteed.

It begins because without entering the water, there can be no journey.

That is the beginning.

We observe.

We learn.

We question.

We confront ourselves.

We listen.

We gather knowledge.

We reach a turning point.

And then, despite uncertainty, we enter the water.

The process begins again.

That is the Dance of Life and its Rhythm.

That is the House of Symbols.

And that is the hope at the center of Eco-Symbolism: that through introspection, critical thought, knowledge, dialogue, courage, and the sharing of what we know, humanity can continue to create possibilities beyond the limits of the individual.

The Library of Humanity's Symbols was given to us by countless people who came before us.

We are not merely its consumers.

We are its present participants.

The question is:

What will we contribute?

What can we create together that we cannot create alone?

And what will we leave behind that is worth carrying forward?

The Eco-Symbolism Manifesto

The numbered principles follow.